 blubat
|
Subject: What do you classify our songs as?
Date: March 5, 2004 @ 1:05 PM
What genre are we?
|
harperandjoh...
|
Subject: Re: What do you classify our songs as?
Date: March 9, 2004 @ 8:41 PM
wow definetly trippy i love it...a work of brilliance, this is some seriously amazing stuff good. wonderful cool awesome. 
|
Emosideproject
|
Subject: Re: What do you classify our songs as?
Date: March 23, 2004 @ 9:53 PM
hmm emo/indie around the lines of that 
id say more towards indie
|
 kingo
|
Subject: Re: What do you classify our songs as?
Date: March 24, 2004 @ 8:59 AM
"Indie" is another one of those catch-all phrases I've used as a classification for our stuff. It's better than the alternative ("alternative"), but it's still so broad as to be almost sometimes meaningless.
Of course all categories are basically meaningless, and it's weird that I've recently been on the "we need a classification!" end of the argument. Usually I don't care about that stuff, but here there are reasons it would be advantageous to have a separate category.
The more I think about it, though, the more I think maybe we should just take over the "other" category. I think I'd PREFER to have a category called "strange" or "bizarre," or "weird," but as that might not happen maybe we should just proselytize about the "other" thing. Get other artists doing what we do to call it "other," at least on here. Cuz some of them already do, and others don't.
Of course I've just been sticking different songs in different genres that they really don't quite fit in. I get a lotta listens to our "bluegrass" tune, and it probably pisses off a lot of people expecting bluegrass. (Oh, if only we could properly do bluegrass...)
Hey, look at me, I never shut up! 
|
kingo
|
Subject: Re: What do you classify our songs as?
Date: March 24, 2004 @ 9:00 AM
Hey, smilies don't work here. Fuckers. :fuckers:
|
|
